Lower-bound the spanning-tree polynomial to sharpen Gaussian \(\chi^2\) bounds
Sourced from the work of Yanjun Han, Jonathan Niles-Weed
§ Problem Statement
Setup
Fix integers and , a positive-definite covariance matrix , and mean vectors . For each , let with density on , and define the average measure with density .
Define two distributions on . The permutation mixture is
equivalently with density . Its i.i.d. counterpart is
with density .
Let . Define by
For this construction, is symmetric, positive semidefinite, and doubly stochastic. Let be the set of spanning trees on vertex set , and define the weighted spanning-tree polynomial
Unsolved Problem
Prove a nontrivial Gaussian-structure-dependent lower bound on (for matrices arising from the above Gaussian family) that could improve the currently available eigenvalue-only upper bound on ,
where are the eigenvalues of . In particular, the goal is to exploit constraints specific to Gaussian-generated beyond trace/spectral-gap information.
§ Discussion
§ Significance & Implications
This is a proposed route in the paper for potentially sharpening approximate-independence guarantees in Gaussian permutation-mixture settings. If stronger (\chi^2) control is obtained, it would typically imply tighter downstream total-variation/testing/decision bounds via standard inequalities; these downstream improvements are inferential unless separately proved. See Han & Niles-Weed (2024) for details.
§ Known Partial Results
Han et al. (2024): The paper proves permanent-based upper bounds for (\chi^2(\mathbb P_n|\mathbb Q_n)), including a bound of the form (\chi^2(\mathbb P_n|\mathbb Q_n)+1\le \prod_{i=2}^n(1-\lambda_i)^{-1}) (with (\lambda_i) eigenvalues of (A)), and identifies this quantity with a spanning-tree polynomial expression; the authors describe exploiting extra structure of (A) as an open direction that could improve Gaussian bounds. This direction appears open in the cited source.
§ References
Approximate independence of permutation mixtures
Yanjun Han, Jonathan Niles-Weed (2024)
Annals of Statistics (to appear)
📍 Section 6.1 (Discussion: Tightness of upper bounds), paragraph immediately after Lemma 6.2 ("for specific $P$, further properties of the matrix $A$...") on p. 26 (arXiv v3; Section 5.1 in earlier numbering)
Source paper where this problem appears.