Sharp characterization of misspecification robustness for debiased GD inference
Sourced from the work of Qiyang Han, Xiaocong Xu
§ Problem Statement
Setup
Let , , be i.i.d. observations from an unknown distribution on . Let be the parameter space, and let be a twice continuously differentiable loss in . Define the population and empirical risks by
Assume the population minimizer
exists and is unique (possibly with outside the working model class used to motivate , i.e., misspecification is allowed).
Starting from , define gradient-descent iterates
with step sizes . For each iteration index , let denote the debiased estimator constructed from past GD iterates by the debiasing scheme of interest. For a fixed nonzero contrast vector , consider the studentized statistic
where estimates the asymptotic standard deviation of .
Unsolved Problem
Characterize, as sharply as possible, the class of misspecification regimes and loss/design structures under which asymptotically valid normal inference holds despite misspecification, e.g.
for each fixed , and to identify where this uniform asymptotic normality must fail.
§ Discussion
§ Significance & Implications
For arXiv:2412.09498v3, the misspecification-robustness wording is supported by the introduction discussion (not as an abstract quote): Section 1.4 (after Eq. (1.11)) points to robustness under limited misspecification and refers to Appendix C.2. The paper does not provide a sharp necessary-and-sufficient boundary for the maximal validity class.
§ Known Partial Results
Han et al. (2024): The paper proves debiased-GD inferential validity in its theorem-specific/model-specific framework and reports additional simulation evidence of robustness, but it does not establish a sharp maximal-class characterization of misspecification robustness. Status remains open.
§ References
Gradient descent inference in empirical risk minimization
Qiyang Han, Xiaocong Xu (2024)
Annals of Statistics (to appear)
📍 arXiv:2412.09498v3, Section 1.4 (paragraph immediately after Eq. (1.11), misspecification-robustness discussion) and Appendix C.2 (simulation evidence under misspecification).
Primary source motivating this synthesized open direction.