§ Problem Statement
Setup
For each sample size , observe i.i.d. pairs generated by the linear model
where , is unknown, and is independent noise. Let be the design matrix with rows , and . Assume is allowed, , with eigenvalues bounded away from and , is sub-Gaussian, and is mean-zero sub-Gaussian (often Gaussian with variance ). Let the parameter space be the sparse class
Let be the Lasso estimator
and define the debiased estimator
where is a data-dependent approximate inverse of (for example, row solves subject to ). For coordinate , define the studentized pivot
with a consistent estimator of the asymptotic variance (e.g., ).
A central unresolved question is to determine sharp conditions on (and on design/noise regularity) for regimes not already covered by existing positive results, under which inference based on is uniformly valid over the whole sparse class and over all coordinates, namely
Several subcases are known (including 2017-era advances under stronger structural assumptions), but the exact frontier of achievable vs. non-achievable scaling remains open in general.
For fixed , one related target is uniform coverage of coordinatewise intervals
in the sense
This fixed- coverage criterion is weaker than full Kolmogorov convergence of the pivot law and does not by itself establish the full uniform distributional approximation above.
Unsolved Problem
Identify precise scaling thresholds (involving , , and ) across unresolved regimes.
§ Discussion
§ Significance & Implications
High-dimensional inference is a cornerstone of modern statistics. While debiased/desparsified estimators (Javanmard & Montanari (2014); Geer et al. (2014); Zhang & Zhang (2014)) provide pointwise asymptotic normality, the uniformity question — crucial for honest confidence intervals — is subtle. This connects to impossibility phenomena in post-model-selection inference (Leeb & Pötscher) and to practically used uniform-inference procedures such as post-double-selection.
§ Known Partial Results
Javanmard et al. (2014): ](#references); Javanmard & Montanari (2014)).
Cai & Guo (2017) establish rigorous uniform-coverage/minimax results for specific high-dimensional CI targets under structured assumptions; this resolves important subcases rather than the full general regime.
Leeb & Pötscher (2006) prove strong non-uniformity/impossibility phenomena for post-model-selection distributional inference, motivating limits on universally honest procedures.
Belloni et al. (2014) provide uniformly valid inference for low-dimensional treatment effects via post-double-selection in high-dimensional sparse designs.
§ References
Confidence intervals and hypothesis testing for high-dimensional regression
Adel Javanmard, Andrea Montanari (2014)
Journal of Machine Learning Research
📍 Section 1.1, paragraph beginning “It is currently an open question whether successful hypothesis testing can be performed under the weaker assumption $s_0=o(n/\log p)$”; JMLR journal pagination p. 2872, corresponding to PDF page 4 in the arXiv/JMLR manuscript layout.
Confidence intervals for low dimensional parameters in high dimensional linear models
Cun-Hui Zhang, S. S. Zhang (2014)
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B
On asymptotically optimal confidence regions and tests for high-dimensional models
Sara van de Geer, Peter Bühlmann, Ya'acov Ritov, Ruben Dezeure (2014)
Annals of Statistics
📍 Section 2 (Main results), Theorem 2.1 (desparsified Lasso asymptotic normality), Annals of Statistics 42(3):1166-1202 (journal pagination; theorem appears in the early Section 2 pages).
Confidence intervals for high-dimensional linear regression: Minimax rates and adaptivity
T. Tony Cai, Zijian Guo (2017)
Annals of Statistics
📍 Main theorems on minimax expected length and coverage for confidence intervals in sparse high-dimensional linear regression (published 2017 version; see theorem statements in the main results section).
Can one estimate the unconditional distribution of post-model-selection estimators?
Hannes Leeb, Benedikt M. Pötscher (2006)
Annals of Statistics
📍 Impossibility/non-uniformity results for post-model-selection distribution estimation (main impossibility theorems).
Inference on treatment effects after selection among high-dimensional controls
Alexandre Belloni, Victor Chernozhukov, Christian Hansen (2014)
Review of Economic Studies
📍 Post-double-selection construction and uniform validity claims for treatment-effect inference after high-dimensional control selection (main theorem section).